PUBLICATIONS

​

Joint Ought

Philosophy and Public Affairs (forthcoming)

early view: doi.org/10.1111/papa.12252 

​

What Are We to Do? The Semantics and Ethics of the Joint Ought

Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)

Co-authored with Margaret Shea

​

Faces of Vicarious Responsibility

The Monist

doi.org/10.1093/monist/onaa035

​

IN THE PIPELINE

​

‘Why Cooperate? Team Reasoning, Participation, and Unwillingness’

Argues that theories of team reasoning cannot account for normative reasons to cooperate.

 

‘Skepticism About the No-Difference Challenge’

Defends the skeptical view that individuals have no reason to avoid collectively harmful acts.

 

‘Thinking Together: Towards a Theory of Joint Deliberation’

Argues that joint deliberation can be understood as a shared activity, through which individuals transition between attitudes together.

 

‘Diachronic Shared Obligation’

Considers whether present individuals can share joint obligations with as-yet non-existent future individuals.

 

‘Choice, Alienation, and the Value of Autonomy’

Argues that the value of autonomy consists neither in the value of choice, nor in that of non-alienation, but rather in the importance of being guided by certain reasons for action.

​

RECENT TALKS

(see my CV for a full list)

​

What Are We to Do? The Semantics and Ethics of the Joint Ought

​

• Chapel Hill Normativity Workshop 2023

• Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress 2023

​

Joint Ought

 

• Berkeley Workshop in Law, Philosophy, and  Political Theory 2022

• Humboldt Normativity Conference 2022

• Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress 2022

​

Team Reasoning: A Dilemma

 

• Social Ontology and Collective Intentionality 2022

​