PUBLICATIONS

​​

What Are We to Do? Making Sense of 'Joint Ought' Talk Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)

Co-authored with Margaret Shea

Joint Ought Philosophy and Public Affairs 52 (2024): 42-68. ​

Selected for a PEA Soup Discussion.

​​

Faces of Vicarious Responsibility The Monist 104 (2021): 238-250.

​

IN THE PIPELINE

​​​

[A paper arguing that joint reasoning can be understood as a shared activity governed by the shared aim of mutually acquiring fitting attitudes]

​

[A paper arguing that joint reasoning is the mode of thought through which agents engage with collective obligations]

​

[A paper arguing that theories of team reasoning fail to account for normative reasons to cooperate]

 

[A paper which describes and motivates a distinctive form of forgiveness, which I call 'forgiveness as humility']

 

[A paper arguing that the value of personal autonomy consists in the importance of being guided by certain kinds of reasons for action]

​

RECENT TALKS

(see my CV for a full list)

​​

Thinking Together

​

• Philadelphia Normative Philosophy Conference 2024

• Social Ontology 2024

​

Why Cooperate? Team Reasons, Participation, and Unwillingness

​

• Laval Everything Agency Conference 2024

​

What Are We to Do? The Semantics and Ethics of the Joint Ought

​

• Chapel Hill Normativity Workshop 2023

• Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress 2023

​

Joint Ought

 

• Berkeley Workshop in Law, Philosophy, and  Political Theory 2022

• Humboldt Normativity Conference 2022

• Rocky Mountain Ethics Congress 2022

​​​